About Ned Armstrong

Ned Armstrong has been a member since July 27th 2014, and has created 77 posts from scratch.

Ned Armstrong's Bio

Ned Armstrong's Websites

This Author's Website is

Ned Armstrong's Recent Articles

Assessing Risk — June 2019

This post involves internal controls.  Risk management involves more than financial issues, but is often the responsibility of the CFO.  From a broad perspective, the CFO must consider several factors:  risk identification; risk quantification issues; and risk planning.

               The first step in risk management is to determine which risks may be most applicable to the firm’s business.  Several sources can be utilized to identify important risks.  One excellent source of risk identification is the firm’s own industry.  This information can be gathered from company operating personnel, competitors that have suffered losses, and public filings of competitors that are publicly held.  Analysis of adjacent industries can also identify risks that could affect the company.  In addition, the study of suppliers with operating problems can make the CFO aware of additional risks.

               Some risks can initially appear to be so vague that it may not seem possible to assign any value at all to them.  Such risks include reputational damage, customer boycotts, and a decline in perception of the firm’s brand.  One potential means of quantifying such risks is to examine the plight of other companies that have experienced the same of similar challenges.

               Other risks are considerably easier to quantify, since a specific action should result in a tightly defined cost or range of costs.  For example, a firm encountering reputational difficulties may need to factor in the costs of lobbyists, extra security personnel, and an advertising campaign.  We caution against reliance on entirely on a financial model, particularly if the model’s output does not appear to match real world results.

               Once the risks have been identified and quantified, three major decisions are required.  One is to mitigate the risks through operational action.  Another is to accept the risk.  The third is to transfer the risk to an insurer.  In addition, the risk planning must be fully factored into the firm’s capital investment planning.  Finally, we advise that several plans of action be developed when the occurrence of a negative event appears to be highly probable.

               Risk management involves more than financial issues, but is often the responsibility of the CFO.  From a broad perspective, the CFO must consider several factors:  risk identification; risk quantification issues; and risk planning.

               Capitol CFO Solutions serves clients in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.  Please contact us for a free consultation.

Go for the Dough $$ — May 2019

               This post involves financial management.  Start-ups and many other small businesses need to frequently raise capital.  The CFO is crucial to the success of this endeavor because the firm’s business plan must include meaningful projections.  The CFO can provide and refine these projections through developing logical financial assumptions.  The assumptions help improve a growth strategy by keeping information simple and emphasizing key metrics such as market size, market share, growth, operating efficiency, and profitability.

               Both revenue and costs must be developed in building the projections.  Critical inputs for revenue estimates enable the development of robust revenue projections.  One input is market levers which are the various opportunities available to earn revenue.   Another is revenue drivers, which are activities that influence that influence levers and produce sales.  A third input is driver activity assumptions that indicate how revenue drivers will act.  This exercise will involve working with the CEO as well as marketing and sales executives.  Finally, a pricing policy is necessary to calculate total revenues.  Integrating these inputs will allow robust revenue assumptions to be development.

               It is important to use a range of activity assumptions to determine a best case scenario, a worst case scenario, and a most likely scenario.  In addition, the CFO must make sure that each revenue assumption is backed up by robust calculations.

               The remainder of the projections include, cost of sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) expenses, and capital investments.  These lead to determination of cash flow which will be of great importance to lenders and investors.

               Cost of Sales are the costs directly related to the product or service and the resultant revenue produced.  It is important to compare the resulting margins to industry benchmarks and similar companies.  In early stage companies, the cost of sales relative to sales may be higher than industry norms, but operational efficiencies should help reduce this ratio over time.

               SG&A expenses include salaries and benefits, marketing expenses; IT related costs, and other costs (such as rent, office supplies credit card fees, etc.).  In the case of the latter it is safe to produce high level assumptions based on revenue, location, industry, etc.  It is important that management stay familiar with technological terminology and cost structures to avoid surprises.  It is also necessary to ensure the marketing and staffing plans align with revenue expectations.  One mistake to avoid is understating legal and accounting fees during inception and early growth spurts.

               Estimate capital investment dollars needed per year and category such as computer hardware, software, machinery, receivables, and inventory.  These estimates should correspond with revenue growth.  It is important that capital providers are shown a capital investment purchasing plan for the business and how the funds will be allocated.

               The preceding inputs are then utilized to calculate cash flow, often expressed as EBITDA in early stage companies and free cash flow in more mature firms.  In either case, capital investments must be highlighted.

               We believe the presentations to capital providers should include a condensed profit and loss statement, cash flow, capital investments, and bullet points on key revenue and expense assumptions.  We also suggest that metrics and graphs be part of the presentation.  These metrics and graphs should address matters such as breakeven point, payback period or IRR, revenue growth, key expenses, major capital investments, and a picture of the full market potential and the firm’s target market share by year.

               We urge that the presentation be comprehensive, yet simple.  Numbers can be rounded to the thousands and key assumptions highlighted.  In addition, we suggest that no decimals be used in the financial projections.  Furthermore, do not confuse the overall story by providing too many details.

               Start-ups and many other small businesses need to frequently raise capital.  The CFO is crucial to the success of this endeavor because the firm’s business plan must include meaningful projections.  The CFO can provide and refine these projections through developing logical financial assumptions.  The assumptions help improve a growth strategy by keeping information simple and emphasizing key metrics such as market size, market share, growth, operating efficiency, and profitability.

               Capitol CFO Solutions serves clients in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.  Please contact us for a free consultation.

Getting the Numbers Right – April 2019

This post involves Financial Reporting.  One important function of the CFO is reporting the firm’s financial performance to management, shareholders, and Board members.  While the CFO does not assemble the financial statements, the CFO oversees their preparation.  In this respect, the CFO’s main interaction is with the controller.

               The controller manages all of the accounting operations within a business.  The controller’s responsibilities include oversight of the accounting including outsourced activities; proper processing of all types of business transactions; preparation of a standard set of monthly financial statements; investigate differences between budgeted and actual results; assure compliance with a wide variety of accounting standards, debt covenants, tax reporting requirements, and government reports.

               There is some duplication in the roles of the CFO and controller.  One is budgeting, where the controller assembles the budget from inputs provided by planning participants (including the CFO).  The CFO reviews the budget to ensure that it dovetails with the strategic direction of the company.

               Another area where the CFO and controller find an overlap of roles is financial statements.   The controller is responsible for assembling the financial statements; the CFO certifies that the financial statements are correct.  In addition, the CFO presents the financial statements to management and investors, along with relevant interpretations of the information.

               The roles of the CFO and controller also overlap in management.  The controller is responsible for the activities of the accounting department.  The CFO oversees the controller, and thus has indirect management over the accounting department.

               One important function of the CFO is reporting the firm’s financial performance to management, shareholders, and Board members.  While the CFO does not assemble the financial statements, the CFO oversees their preparation.  In this respect, the CFO’s main interaction is with the controller.               

Capitol CFO Solutions serves clients in Washington, D>C., Maryland, and Virginia.  Please contact us for a free consultation.

Keep on the Right Path – March 2019

This post concerns Strategy.  Every well run company needs a strategy to be successful in the eyes of shareholders, customers, and employees.  The CEO is ultimately responsible for the strategy a company pursues.  The CFO plays an important role, too.  CFOs tend to be much more knowledgeable about the finances, processes, and risk mitigation necessary to achieve the CEO’s strategic vision.

               Given the CFO’s focus on risk, it is the position best able to say “no” to divergence from the firm’s strategy.  The reason is that such divergence involves moving from known risks to unknown risks as well as areas where the risks are not obvious.  Thus, the CFO can help tighten the strategic focus.  There are four areas where the CFO can contribute.

               First, is to secure agreement on areas to avoid.  It is wise for a strategy to determine, in light of finite resources, which areas to shun.  This enables the firm to maintain focus on smaller projects which are most likely to succeed.  We suggest the CFO maintain a master list of areas to avoid and point out instances when the company seems determined to pursue one or more of these alternatives.

               Second, we believe there are many options within a company’s area of strategic focus.  Accordingly, it is essential that many initiatives are funded.  Some will fail, but others will succeed or enhance other ideas.  We recommend that the CFO keep a detailed ledger of the amount of funds being allocated to various opportunities that the firm has identified.  

               Third, the CFO should drive the effort to understand when a project does not appear to have an adequate payoff and make the case for deployments of the funds elsewhere.  The CFO is in an excellent position to identify these situations since the CFO has no ego involvement and can dispassionately evaluate the project from a largely quantitative perspective.

               Fourth, we believe the CFO should act as a governor on coming to market prematurely.  This can be accomplished by examination of mistakes made by competitors and encouraging minor adjustments to the project that can result in faster customer acceptance.

               The foregoing approaches may make the CFO appear to be a skunk at a picnic.  However, this is a critical role for which the CFO is often the best suited executive team member.

               Every well-run company needs a strategy to be successful in the eyes of shareholders, customers, and employees.  The CEO is ultimately responsible for the strategy a company pursues.  The CFO plays an important role, too.  CFOs tend to be much more knowledgeable about the finances, processes, and risk mitigation necessary to achieve the CEO’s strategic vision.

               Capitol CFO Solutions serves clients in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.  Please contact us for a free consultation.

Actively Manage your Cash Balances – February 2019

This post involves Treasury.  A cash sweeping system is designed to move cash in outlying bank accounts into a central concentration account(s), thereby maximizing the efficiency of cash disbursements, avoiding various bank imposed restrictions and charges, and receiving more income on idle cash balances.  The disadvantages of cash sweeping include triggering some bank loan covenants as well as missing late deposits.  There are several alternatives to cash sweeping.

               One is notional pooling whereby cash is allowed to stay where it is under local control, but is recorded as if all the cash has been centralized.  This method is useful when individual accounts are owned by subsidiaries which want control over their own accounts.  However, notional pooling is not allowed in some countries.  Moreover, it cannot be used where accounts are being administered by more than one bank.  This can be solved by multi-tiered banking where excess cash is siphoned from lower tier banks to higher tier banks.

               Irrespective of the type of cash concentration being used, there are certain best practices to be followed:

  • Review low usage accounts to see if funds can be shifted to a more active account.
  • Review accounts of acquired businesses to determine if the number of accounts can be reduced.
  • Mandate deposit cutoff times.
  • Charge back administrative expenses to subsidiaries that accumulate material charges due cash concentration activities.

               There are several alternatives to cash concentration systems.  One is to maintain small local balances.  Another is to allow local managers considerable leeway to conduct operations as they see fit.  In addition, management may initiate manual cash sweeps quarterly, semi-annually, or annually.

               A cash sweeping system is designed to move cash in outlying bank accounts into a central concentration account(s), thereby maximizing the efficiency of cash disbursements, avoiding various bank imposed restrictions and charges, and receiving more income on idle cash balances.  The disadvantages of cash sweeping include triggering some bank loan covenants as well as missing late deposits.  Alternatives include notional pooling and decentralization of cash balances to give local managers leeway to conduct operations as they see fit.

               Capitol CFO Solutions serves clients in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.  Please contact us for a free consultation.